Archive for the ‘Writing’ Category

Finding Your Voice

August 4th, 2008

Books are made to be sold, in that they are produced as consumable items and marketed as leisure activities for the masses. But the great books, the ones that linger beyond trends and fads are not necessarily deep, penetrating works of philosophy or sophistry; they are unique because they have that something, that extra polish which grabs hold and won’t let go, long after you’ve put the book down. They have a voice, all their own. This above all is the thing we have beaten out of many students and aspiring authors. In our zeal to accomplish homogeneity of language and culture, we have expressed an unwillingness to allow exploration that might step outside these carefully approved areas. Whether we find fault or simply cause, it is the industry itself which contributes to the synchronization of ideas and elements, so that movie writers are so starved for ideas that they must turn outside of themselves completely, looking to things like comics; a place where unique vision and telling is prized above blockbuster aspirations.

This isn’t some polemic about the loss of anything in particular. Actually, I just want to express some basic ideas I’ve found helpful in working toward some measure of individuality in what I do. Think the tipping point came when I read the fourth or fifth article in a row that practically forbade me to write unless I had read hundreds of books in my genre. This is of course not unlike the literature review for the dissertation I never started. It’s hazing. Yes, it has some measure of validity, but it is still hazing. Pay homage and tremble at all who came before you. In academics, I see the point of making language and ideas work readily together. Kuhn should be consulted, as he expresses my own view of the nature of scientific progress, but not in this small setting. In literature, it is so dangerous to assume that you cannot begin to write lest you have read everything.

The secret I learned for myself is that it’s all been done before. It’s all been told and retold in so many ways, sometimes much more creatively than I could imagine myself. So yes, I have read, and continue to read in the areas that interest me, but I gave up the idea of truly being unique in plot or story, and instead set myself on a different path, one that really starts and ends inside of me. What I learned from reading in my genre were some basic ideas of the language that teen readers have come to expect in what they read. But I did not see this as a barrier, more an opening. And rather than looking at how one author does or does not offer didactic platitudes to uninterested adolescents; I just started looking at myself, at what was happening within me as I read.

It felt fake. Most of all of this felt just a little less than stick figures. Now there are exceptional instances where I was tied to the characters as though I knew them myself. And it was this, more than subject matter, or reading level that caught me. I stumbled across a book called Breathing Life Into Your Characters, and found it helpful for refocusing myself. Of course it bandies about that you shouldn’t make the characters a projection of yourself; and I find this to be only helpful to a point. When I write, I have to feel as the characters do, and if I’m intuned, then they do become alive, and often lead me along as we go. But if I didn’t have a piece of me in every one of them, there would be no connection, no element for me to focus on. When the character is dirty or injured, I have to feel that too. And when I’m writing the angst, the turmoil, I have to feel the pressure in my own chest, my anxiety peaking as the situation hangs unresolved. The joy, sorrow, pain, and ecstasy all have to grounded somewhere inside of me first.

There is no formula, no method. I’ve looked, and tried. I enjoyed The Writer’s Journey, because it confirmed that since man began telling each other of exploits, there has been a formula to it. Even in biography, we expect some arc of development, and those able to find it make truly wonderful historians. But it has, most definitely, been done before. Forget the desire to create something unique; lose it to the mists of unfulfilled desires and then rest. Beside, you don’t really desire this, you desire a connection with people, one that you think will be brought on by that flare of new and different. This is not what makes that. It is you, you creeping around the pages of what you wrote that does this. If you are true and able, the soul of your creation will speak to those people, and they will love you. It will seem new and different because no one looks at the story in simple terms unless you force them too. A bad movie is easily summarized as a pale imitation of something greater because there is nothing to interrupt the comparisons. No character to stand up for you and shout at those detractors to take head and listen.

What is different, is you. Abraham has sacrificed his son countless times, and Cain has been slaying Able for millenia. Yet when you tell it, you put a piece of your own soul in there; that is why it is different. How then do you do this? First look long and hard at you. Find the messy bits and poke them, play with them until they ooze and swirl; possibly in pain, but sometimes in joy. That’s what everyone else ignores in themselves, and pretends doesn’t exist. And it’s also what they love to see in everyone else. Be your own gossip rag, and find the juicy bits dangling out the side of your baggage. Know thyself, artist; then shall you know everyone.

I began Forgotten in the third person, imitative of Rowling. It’s called a limited omnipotent narrator. It’s not the main character, but it’s someone just behind them. They can’t travel far, but often see things a little less gilded than whom they speak of. It’s a really great tool, and it absolutely destroyed my voice. My angel, my editor asked me why I was writing a first person narrative in the third person. My feeble defense of market research and expected genre fell upon the table and gasped for a final breath before dying in rotted stink over another round of beer. Painfully, I rewrote thirteen chapters into the first person, and found that what had been a good story became alive with a spark that seemed impossible, even to me. More than that, it freed the story to grow around the cave which had for so long terrified my dreams.

Your voice will change, it must. It will find the character where she waits, and if you stay out of the way, it will follow and develop her through all the familiar pieces of heroic quests; except no one has ever seen it like she has. A cave is not just a cave when it plays upon the fearful, troubled by years of confined dwelling in the face of near death and suffering. The dragon looks not like a beast, but a tender soul trapped by language and bigotry. Unless you try to force it. Then you will have something that might be timely, and popular; but it has cost you something in return. Some unexpressed bit of you that now withers in the cold.

It will be messy, and scary, and you will feel like they all see you naked and scared, scampering from recto to verso in a mad tirade of suppressed glee. And it’s all true. It is you, in all your scary glory laid bare. They stare and poke and tease. They call you names, and look down their noses, comparing size and color. You are humiliated and broken; but then a laugh. A single joyous note that breaks the spectacle and you see them not looking at you, but enjoying the lives you breathed your soul into. In the end, you are saved, whisked away by your hero and your villain, while the supporting cast distracts them all. Then from the side stage, hidden by the curtain you watch it all unfold. And share in the joy and tears, until the curtain falls and they call “Author”.

Look inside and breath. Take what you find and then start to sketch. Draw if you have to, but I just write out little bits and pieces of scenes and dialog that come to my mind. At one point, I was so stuck I had to write the same scene from all three characters perspectives, until I could understand each of their dynamics. Then when I wrote again, it was they who acted, and I just recorded their dialog, and did my best to observe their faces for signs of hidden meaning or suppressed emotion. It won’t be good, not yet. Because what you’re really doing is expressing all that you desire for them, getting it all out and then letting yourself be empty. An expectant author is like an overprotective father who fails to teach his child to ride for fear that she will fall. Your characters need to fail horribly, to be miserable and to commit murder. They need to disappoint and anger you. You need to chuck the pages into the wall in a rage at the incompetence they offer you. But you must love them anyway. You must hold them and coo softly in their ears until the moment is passed.

I refused to keep writing Forgotten once Xanatos got to his point of departure from what I knew he could be. As he fell in on himself, I couldn’t do it any longer. It was six or seven weeks before I was able to make my way back. I worked on other books in the series, even created an entirely new set of characters for later exploration. I hated the things he was doing, and the state he was in. I knew he was better, grander. I saw him at his peak, his strongest and most illustrious. But I hadn’t the patience to walk him through the wasteland. It sucked. And then we met, and though we could not stand each other, we got down to it. And he surprised me. He created the most tender and visceral moment possible in the midst of what I had intended to be only death. And he looked at me, and nodded. You will know the part when you read it. He is my son, my prodigal, my bane, and my love.

Love yourself. Do not seek to write because you want to; do it because you must. I didn’t understand this, and it was why I could not write until recent years. Because if I don’t, I die. I crumble and fall into agony. Let it be your compulsion, but be honest in it. If nothing is coming, walk away. I don’t believe you must write everyday simply to write. Read Zen in the Art of Writing. You will not see a formula but a sickness that drive Bradbury to create a new story every week. For me to do the same would only sicken me. I circle my prey like a vulture, waiting for the stink to rise into the heavens. And then I slowly consume the rotten flesh until it fills me with vile, putrid disgust. Then, I wait.

They told me I couldn’t write. I believed them. Don’t do the same. When I watch my friend play her violin, I see the pressure in her chest that must escape lest she burst and spill her guts upon the floor. When I write, I feel sick and wretched, and then I feel complete and whole. The blank page used to scare the fuck out of me. It was clean and pristine, and too easily sullied by my ineptitudes. Like a goddess she shamed me and my inexpert technique. And like a shaved Labrador I spit and huffed upon her golden flesh; not even sure this was enjoyable. Certain that she would merely laugh at the lack of stamina and marvel at my blind groping. And then I would collapse in spasms and writhe about in my own bile. She is not a goddess. She is a whore. Tender and careful. When I moved beyond the illusion I found a muse; someone to guide my movements, to whisper slow instruction as I tried to burst forth.

You are the most interesting person in the world when you put pen to paper. That was how I did it. I took up a pen and let it splutter and spurt upon the page until was gross and disgusting. Then I could see it for what it was. Cheap makeup and plastic heals. The allure, the grandeur was gone. But in that filth, I found myself. A voice arose, and I let it speak. I could always tell when I had gone astray, because that voice, that charm was gone. It was a chore to work, and the paper seemed flat. I don’t know what will incite you; I just know it won’t be found on the shelves in a bookstore. Go there and find interesting trinkets. Carry them if you must; every witch doctor does what he must. Eventually you have to take off your clothes and start grubbing in the muck. Nothing compares to the sensual ecstasy of being filthy in the light of day.

Love yourself, be yourself. Lose yourself and let yourself go. Fall, die, turn over in your grave. But hold your characters, the pieces of your soul so tightly that all you have left is them. They are your breathe, your organ, your heart. Bend them over the earth and drink in their bitter taste. Then write, and never forget what they feel like on the inside, as they run across your skin and plunge themselves back into you. Then write.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Musings, Writing | Comments (0)

Getting Published

July 31st, 2008

Right now I’m experiencing the woes of publishing, but thankfully, I’ve done a lot of research to this point, and having worked in the book industry, I like to think I understand things a bit better now. The main question that’s been before me is, seek an agent/publisher or self-publish. Honestly, I’m leaning toward self-publishing, but I thought I’d explain the benefits and process for both. In the end, I saw many first time authors working their butts off to get their books out there, without any help from the publisher at all. Probably a smaller sampling due to my single location, but it stuck with me. I’ll try and be fair though, pointing out what each method is about.

An agent is perhaps the best option for adult fiction, and most non-fiction. This is a professional who knows the industry, has the contacts, and has done this countless times before. Getting on with an agent is worth it if you have the product they’re looking for. Disabuse yourself now, publishing is about money; what sells, and to whom. So the agents are picky, and niched toward what they know they can sell. This doesn’t mean that they don’t have open minds, or that first time authors need not apply. Acutally, there are some agents out there looking for first time authors. Check with the latest Writer’s Market, or Children’s Writer’s Market; it will detail who and what each agent or publisher is looking for. The key part of this is simultaneous or exclusive submissions. Top publishers and agents may want the first crack at your book, and won’t share the viewing priveleges with anyone else. On top of that, some agents and publishers may need a few months to process your manuscript sample. Thus you can spend a lot of time waiting to send it to someone else.

The key to getting an agent, or going directly to a publisher is the query letter. There are a large number of books available, so check them out. What matters is the bottom line, is this something that is going to sell. You have to do the leg work and know your market, but also know how yours is not just a clone of something else. The experts say read lots of books, and that can’t hurt, but I think you have to also develop a voice that’s interesting to others. It would help if you knew what the readers expect in certain areas, but just because they expect one thing doesn’t mean a truly original voice isn’t warranted. However, too original means unproved and may run you into trouble in the getting an agent/publisher process. Your entire book, and the reasons why it’s marketable get summed up in the query letter. It’s the key to success.

Specifically, an agent will make the submission process streamlined and tailored. Finding one can be as difficult as querying the publishers directly, except they have access to the major publishers who refuse to take direct queries, (called unsolicited.) They also charge a fee for their services. If you get an agent, you’ve got a pro to help you. If you go directly, you’re doing all the legwork and research yourself. Neither is particularly better, though I’ve heard from one young adult author, Erin Vincent, Grief Girl, that she had good luck going straight to the publishers. Children editors attend conferences, and it was there she met her eventual editor; managing to get published by Random House. Officially of course, they don’t accept non-represented authors, but she managed to get her foot in the door.

By going through a publisher you are looking at an advance, and then around 10% royalties, possibly a little more. That’s the tricksy part because you have to earn the advance back before you get more money. The average life of a new hardcover book is three months on retail shelves. There’s a limited window to get the sales going for your book. However, you do get immediate distribution to retail buyers, and while the publisher may not be able to give you specific marketing time, they do send out your book info to a lot of buyers, and you are published in their catalogs, as well as being submitted for review by major periodicals; Publisher’s Weekly chief among them. There is a machine behind them, and it can launch you ahead of the rest if you’re willing to put in effort as well.

The drawbacks to publishers are pretty well listed above. I should point out that having an editor is essential for either option, and that’s what a publisher really offers you. Someone who knows their stuff. I feel like this is why we are getting a lot of the same fare recently, but most of it is well written and well edited. Personally, I don’t see too many new things, interesting departures, and something to challenge the readers. But again, it’s about what sells, and Gossip Girl does, quite well. What you get with self-publishing is freedom to fly or fall. It means you put out the money, $299 at the least if you have an editor, artist and the know how to format your book, and $599 to $1499 depending on how much of those you’re missing. Royalties are much higher, and as most of Print on Demand publishing is sold online, you can get affiliate sales revenue as well just by selling your own book through Amazon or another online retailer.

So, why am I interested in self-publishing? The Xanatos series is different, it’s a chance in a new direction, and it isn’t exactly what agents and editors are used too. It’s kind of edgy with language and content. Cidne, my editor, calls it hormonally charged. But it’s real, it’s what a real boy would be doing and thinking. So my first concern is the content, and the control that I have over it. Nobody can really tell me no. If this doesn’t work, then that might have been a good thing, but I’m confident based on the feedback I’ve been getting. The cost is annoying, but 35% royalties over time mean a shorter return on investment. Also, a more stable income than the publisher structure. Not to mention I own the copyright. Didn’t mention that earlier, but with most publisher you sell the first run rights to them, and they may even take the reprint rights as well. It’s dependent on your contract. It’s also non-exclusive so if a publisher does become interested, I can still sell my book POD self-published, and contract for different versions with a publisher. Not that they’d play that well most of the time, but one can hope.

Print on Demand, POD, is different than most books you see. Publishers use the offset printing method and that is based on the very first printing press where they arranged the letters by hand. Most books are put onto master plates and then run off a line. POD is more like a high-end laser printer, so the pages are usually a little more glossy, and the text doesn’t have that stamped feel to them. Someone who reads a lot and is savy about the process can tell instantly, but your words are the same in either format. It’s more a snobbery thing to see one process as superior to the other. Actually, what you should be careful of is the binding. Make sure you pick a POD partner who actually produces a good looking cover, with a spine. Because the spine is what the customer sees on the shelf, and the cover is the second highest reason a book is sold. The good news for POD is that a friends recommendation is the top reason why people buy a book. Marketing through things like Facebook can get any author out there, POD or regular publisher. A high quality POD is different, but not necessarily less than a publishers offset book.

I don’t like rejection either, and the time frame that rejection takes is a year or more, and then usually another year before the book gets published. So over two years, if I sell 50 books POD then I’ll have my investment back and every book after is revenue. During which time, I’m proving my book’s worth, which can eventually make a publisher interested. I prefer them to come to me, but that’s the way I am. It would take about 600 books sold to equal the normal amount of an advance, but you have to sell about 1389 books to make your advance back from publishers; in the end it’s one return on invest model vs. another. Either way, don’t expect to be rich quick, or to survive on writing at the start. You’ll need a day job for a little while.

For a lot of authors, publishers are exactly what they need. But I’m a little different, and you may be too. You’ve probably heard, but the Inheritance Trilogy by Paolini started as a self-published book. It’s one way to prove your product out, to show that teens will read massive Tolkien like novels about dragons. Be true to your text, and recognize that an editors eyes are essential. There can’t be simple spelling and grammar errors, and you need to make sure the fat is trimmed and the story is robust. Be true to your voice, and get help to make sure it’s coming through. I’ll write more about that later. But I’m really looking toward self-publishing because I know what I have is good, well put together, and my friend is an excellent editor. If you have questions, please use my contact form to ask them. I’ll even read a first chapter and give you suggestions on whether self-publishing is a good option. I’ll gladly share all that I learned working at Borders. It makes me happy to see new authors succeed because I hope to do the same.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Books, Education, Writing | Comments (0)

The Semicolon: The brink of english extinction

June 27th, 2007

I have been writing my book, and as always, spending time with my beloved Chicago Manual of Style. I remember falling in love with this style guide through the lovely work of Kate Turabian, who thankfully took the dense and often overwhelming manual and made it usable for college students. Oddly enough it was footnotes that drew me in. I absolutely hate endnotes, and in line citations make be gag, (literally.) Now I return to my beloved tome when I am feeling the need to focus on incredibly precise modes of English expression. (I am odd enough that I am fascinated by the difference between British and American methods of terminal punctuation. [Specifically that it can occur within a parenthetical statement unless absolutely necessary for clarity in American writing. Whereas the British always place it outside of parenthetical elements.]) Thus I began a ten page exploration of the semicolon; a method of writing that suits my needs quite well, but one which I had never been taught in school. The diabolic attempt to rid ourselves of this precious punctuation was uncovered as I read my other lovely book, Spunk and Bite.

Read the rest of this entry »

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Rants, Writing | Comments (0)

A Pat on the Back

June 25th, 2007

I have just recently finished the rough cut of my novel that I am working on in conjunction with my little “brothers.” It’s the first in a series of seven. (I realize the uncanny resemblance to extant young adult literature, however, it was never intended to reach such a hallowed number. When I sat down and mapped out the story, it grew from three, to five, and finally to seven books.) It was quite a feat, and I am proud of myself for getting it finished.
Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Books, Writing | Comments (0)

-->